A portrait on a wall in Aligarh Muslim University (AMU) is at
the centre of a massive row. Displaying the Muslim League leader and founder of
Pakistan, Muhammad Ali Jinnah, the portrait has hung there since the late
1930s, comfortably sharing space with other stalwarts of Indian history
like Mahatma
Gandhi, CV Raman and C. Rajagopalachari among others. Earlier this week,
however, the portrait’s presence was questioned by BJP MP from Aligarh, Satish
Gautam.
In defence of the portrait, AMU
spokesperson Shafey Kidwai said Jinnah
was accorded life membership of the AMU students’ union in 1938, during
undivided India, and that traditionally all life members’ portraits are placed
on the walls of the AMU students’ union hall.
Jinnah’s portrait at AMU,
however, is also a reminder of the
multi-dimensional nature of Indian history. The campus of AMU had been
buzzing with political activity ever since it was established in 1875 as the Muhammadan Anglo-Oriental College by social
reformer Syed Ahmad Khan. From being a bastion of staunch supporters of
western education and British rule, to transforming into a space bustling with
slogans of the nationalist movement, to turning into a university that strongly
supported the Muslim League and its demand for a separate nation for Muslims,
is noted to have changed political colour in keeping with the changing
atmosphere of the time.
Jinnah’s portrait inside its
campus today needs to be looked at keeping in mind the multi-coloured richness
of AMU’s history.
AMU and the nationalist
movement
Since its inception in 1875, the
educational centre that went on to become AMU had played an instrumental role
in providing intellectual and political leadership to important sections of the
Muslim community. During its initial
days, the AMU held a strongly pro-British policy. Its founder, Syed Ahmad
Khan, was of the firm belief that a western
mode of education was the only way to uplift Indian society and rejuvenate the
Muslim community. Consequently, the college premises served the purpose of
grooming students in British mores and habits, along with cultivating in them a
European educational spirit.
But things changed rapidly with
the advent of the twentieth century. The agitation
against the Nagri resolution in 1900 and then the students’ strike of 1907 were
just some of the events that bore testimony to a change in the political
atmosphere at MAO college. “This most ‘benighted’ and conservative of
institutions suddenly exploded into political activity confronting the British
with the most serious Muslim movement of
dissidence they had faced since the 1857 revolt,” writes historian Mushirul
Hasan in his work “Nationalist and separatist trends in Aligarh, 1915-47.”
Encouraged by the change of character in the university life, Gandhi
and his Khilafatist allies turned to them for support for the Non-cooperation
Movement of 1920. When Gandhi visited Aligarh to address the university crowd,
he is known to have been warmly received by the students’ union. Similar
welcome was also accorded to Jawaharlal Nehru when
he addressed a meeting at Stratchy Hall of the University in 1933. The
students’ newsletter, ‘Aligarh Magazine’,
frequently published articles invoking a united nationalist spirit. Addressing
the university in 1930, the vice-president of the students’ union spoke of
AMU’s role in the freedom movement in the following words: “Turn ourselves into
the biggest, the most disciplined, the most educated and the most united army
that India possesses, to fight against the evils that have made India the
laughing stock of the world and let nobody say that Aligarh lagged behind
anybody in India’s battle of freedom.”
AMU and Jinnah
It is only from the late 1930s that we see a sudden shift in loyalty
towards Jinnah. This change in attitude was rather surprising to many
contemporaries. Previously, for a long time, Jinnah’s relationship with the
university was quite tenuous. His attitude towards the alumni ranged from being
indifferent to hostile. But there are several reasons that contributed to AMU
suddenly welcoming Jinnah with open arms.
Mushirul Hasan believes that
there are three major reasons behind
this switch in political character of the university. First, by now the Muslim intelligentsia, feeling rather
alienated by the Congress and also quite alarmed by the growth in Hindu-Muslim
frictions, were keen on developing a solidified Muslim consciousness. Second, Jinnah filled up the space for a much
needed uniting figure among the Muslims who
were hitherto segregated along regional lines. Third, this was also the time
when the Islamic community at large
throughout the world gained a new-found communal consciousness on account of
the Khilafat issue. Jinnah’s call at this juncture was just the need of the
hour for what the students’ union of AMU saw as necessary for the larger
interests of their community.
Lastly, Jinnah himself made every
effort in gaining a stronger foothold on the university. “He sedulously
cultivated Vice-Chancellor Ziauddin, maintained regular contacts with the
League and the AIMSF organisers, offered generous funds to the Muslim
University City League, and made frequent trips to Aligarh, which were observed
as ‘Jinnah week’ in the University and
formed an important event in Jinnah’s political itinerary,” writes Hasan.
But, of course, there were many in the university who fervently voiced their
protest against the League’s political activities. Eminent among them were
names like Rashid Ahmad Siddiqi and Mohammad Habib.
When the Partition took place,
the AMU found itself in a state of crisis. “The number of students began to
fall heavily, and despite the arrival of refugees from Pakistan, the fall in
numbers continued,” writes academic Shamin Akhtar. “Thus, Aligarh’s response to the Pakistan movement needs to be viewed in
an all-India perspective, and its reasons must be located in the convergence of
a wide range of factors which made the resolution of communal differences
increasingly difficult,” writes Hasan. Over time, the university has
retained its reputation as one of the finest educational and cultural centers
of the country. Its association with Jinnah was one among the many twists and
turns that history has accorded to any and every institute of relevance within
the subcontinent.
Credit: Indian Express Research (http://indianexpress.com/article/research/muhammad-ali-jinnah-aligarh-muslim-university-hindu-yuva-vahini-amu-a-love-hate-relationship-5163066/)
Reach Us
if you face difficulty in understanding the above article.
No comments:
Post a Comment