In the summer of 1967, a tiny
village on the foothills of the Himalayas was making headlines. Located in the Darjeeling district in West Bengal,
Naxalbari lit a fire that would spread across large parts of India and burn
till today in the form of the Maoist
movement. The peasants of Naxalbari,
who mainly worked on tea plantations and
at large estates, had for centuries been exploited
by the landowning classes and the moneylenders. On March 25, 1967, when one of
the sharecroppers in the village tried to till the land from which he had
been illegally evicted, the landlord got him brutally beaten up and took away
his belongings. Exasperated by the exploitation of the landlords, peasants
across the village got together and rose
in rebellion.
In the two years before 1967, the
seeds of rebellion in Naxalbari were
being nurtured by the cadres of the Communist Party
of India (Marxist) (CPI-M). A splinter group from the Communist
Party of India (CPI), the CPI-M was convinced that a real socialist revolution was possible only when the workers and peasants would launch an armed
uprising against the moneyed classes. After the March 25 incident at
Naxalbari, they were convinced that the moment had arrived. Charu Mazumdar, one of the leaders of
the CPI-M, is believed to have held that “there was an excellent revolutionary situation in the country with all the
classical symptoms”. On May 25 that year,
he along with the two other key leaders, Kanu
Sanyal and Jangal Santhal, launched the peasant uprising in Naxalbari. The movement was quick to face the
wrath of the state government with the police
dealing with protesters with an iron
hand. Nonetheless, in the next few days, months and decades, the Naxalbari
uprising would go on to determine the very nature of armed revolution in India.
The movement in its current form
has altered significantly, both in its nature and objectives. In the late sixties and early seventies, the
Naxalbari uprising ignited a fire in the hearts of both the urban youth and the
rural masses. In the next few months, similar movements became common in
pockets of Bihar, Jharkhand and West Bengal, in parts of Odisha, all the way
till Andhra Pradesh and Maharashtra. “For the first time in post-independence
India the movement asserted the demands
of the poor and landless peasantry in a way that shook the then atrophied
Indian political scene,” writes historian Sumanta Banerjee. Also significant
was the way the movement appealed to the
urban youth, particularly students, from some of the most esteemed
universities of the country, for whom the movement exemplified the precise way in which the establishment
could be challenged.
Naxalbari and the restless
urban India youth
“People are reacting. Naxalbari
is an inspiration. It’s an impetus for change,” says Udayan, the fictionalised character of Jhumpa Lahiri in her book “The Lowland.” A student of Presidency
University, Udayan’s euphoria at the outbreak of the uprising was evident in
the way he challenged his family and joined a group of simmering revolutionary
intelligentsia in supporting the Naxal cause. Lahiri’s protagonist set in the
background of Calcutta in the 1960s is a reflection of a similar character set
in Delhi in Sudhir Mishra’s “Hazaron
Khwaishein Aisi”.
Mishra’s protagonist Siddharth Tyabji (played by Kay Kay
Menon) was a student in Delhi University. A firebrand Naxalite of the
seventies, he decides to leave his life of luxury to move to a village in Bihar
in the hope of bringing revolution against the oppressive tendencies of upper
caste landlords. Both the characters of Lahiri and Mishra are reflective of a generation of young people,
affected beyond measure by the Naxal movement, despite being far removed
from the site in which the uprising primarily took place.
In the immediate aftermath of the
Naxal uprising, the urban youth of India, several among them being from the
privileged sections of society, were remarkably inspired to rise in revolution.
Descendants of a generation that had seen Independence, for those in their
twenties in the 1960s and 70s, Naxalbari
was their moment of bringing change in the way in which their parents’
generation had risen against the colonial state. It was not uncommon to see
posters of Naxalbari hanging across the walls of colleges in Calcutta and Delhi.
Many students left college to join the Naxalites.
Charu Mazumdar took a number of
steps as well to entice students into joining the Naxal movement. He declared
that the revolution was not just for the rural masses but rather a fight against everyone who was a ‘class
enemy’ which included University teachers, businessmen, police and, of course,
the government. Naxalites took over Jadavpur University and Calcutta
University. Presidency College in Calcutta and St. Stephens in Delhi became
hotbeds for Naxalite activities.
The state, too, could not remain
immune for long from the ‘disruptive’ activities of the students and went after
them. Reportedly, it was at the house of Congress MLA Somen Mitra where
students were held up illegally by the police and government officials. Till
date, several upper-middle-class families belonging to these urban centres
narrate tales of family members and friends who had to be flown outside the
country, or somehow suppressed, in order to escape the wrath of the state.
Naxalbari and the agitating
rural masses
The real achievement of the movement, however, lay in the way it shook up rural India. “It continues to
arouse them to protest and take up arms
against their feudal oppressors, and even take on the Indian state whenever
it sends its police to protect these feudal interests, whether in the villages
of Bihar or the tribal hamlets of Andhra Pradesh,” writes Banerjee.
In the days immediately following
the Naxalbari uprising, a similar uprising took place at Srikakulam in Andhra Pradesh.
Believed to have its roots in the Telangana rebellion of 1946, the uprising at
Srikakulam in October 1967 is said
to be inspired by the Naxalbari episode.
Two men associated with the communists, Koranna
and Manganna, were killed here by
the local landlords. In retaliation,
the tribal population of the village rose up in arms, looting the landlords
of their land and grains. The movement escalated by 1968 when groups of tribal
peasants organised themselves into guerilla squads to attack police officers.
Bihar was influenced as well. Movements modeled along the lines of
Naxalbari sprung up in the Mushahari region of Muzaffarpur district in north
Bihar, in parts of Bhojpur and Patna districts in central Bihar, and in
Hazaribagh, Ranchi, Singhbhum and Dhanbad districts of south Bihar. Kerala saw a period of time when the movement
was backed by students and resulted in a violent crackdown by the
authorities.
Fifty-one years later, the movement is mainly operating in parts of
Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Orissa and
Andhra Pradesh. It was dealt with severely, particularly during the
Emergency period under the then prime minister, Indira Gandhi. In the
ensuing decades, despite a strong surveillance by the Indian police, the
movement managed to remain alive although in a significantly altered form.
“The programme of agrarian revolution and anti-imperialist mobilisation have
acquired a fresh appeal in the era of globalisation and economic reforms seen
in the past two decades and also since the US-led ‘war on terror’ that
began in 2001,” writes political scientist Manoranjan Mohanty in his article
“Challenges of revolutionary violence: the Naxalite movement in perspective.”
He goes on to say that in such an
atmosphere tribal people increasingly find themselves distressed by shrinking
access to forest resources and large-scale displacement by mega-mining projects.
Sumantra Banerjee adds that “if the
movement is still surviving, the credit is due not so much to prescience of its
leaders, as to the Indian state which, with its abysmal failures in
socio-economic areas, persists in nourishing the soil for the continuation of
the Naxalite movement.”
Credit: Indian Express Research (http://indianexpress.com/article/research/51-years-of-naxalbari-how-a-peasant-uprising-triggered-a-pan-india-political-movement-5191046/)
Reach Us
if you face difficulty in understanding the above article.
No comments:
Post a Comment