Recent Developments
Reserve
Bank of India’s biannual Financial
Stability Report has once again flagged the fact that risks to the banking sector remain
worryingly “high”.
In
the central bank’s assessment, risks
have stayed elevated due to:
*
Continuous deterioration in asset quality
*
Low profitability
*
Liquidity issues
Important Role of Commercial
Lenders:
Given
the central role commercial lenders have in the financial system — serving to
harness public savings and direct the flow of crucial credit to the most
productive industrial and infrastructure sectors — any systemic risk to the
banking industry has the potential to ripple across the entire economy.
Risks faced by Lending Sector:
A
systemic risk survey completed in October was itself rather downbeat. Out of 34
categories of risk, the survey rated only 11to be very low or low, leaving 23
to be rated as medium to high risk.
Cyber
security, credit growth, asset quality, capital adequacy, infrastructure
creation and corporate profitability were already considered high risk then.
Demonetisation has only increased the risk.
Given the above scenario, we
revisit the recommendations made by Standing Committee on Finance (Chair: Dr. M
Veerappa Moily)
Standing
Committee Report Summary: Non-Performing Assets of Financial Institutions
The
Standing Committee on Finance (Chair: Dr. M Veerappa Moily) submitted its
report on Non Performing Assets of Financial Institutions on February 24, 2016.
The report makes recommendations to improve the management, and facilitate
recovery of Non-Performing Assets.
* Non-Performing Assets:
A non-performing asset (NPA) is a loan given by a financial institution, which
ceases to generate income. NPAs include loans where payment has been overdue for more
than 90 days. The Committee observed that despite the government and
the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) taking several steps, NPAs continue to increase.
* Empowered Committees:
It observed that banks do not have adequate capability to undertake credit
appraisal. Credit appraisal involves evaluating capacity of the
borrower, to ensure he is capable of repaying the loan. In
this context, it recommended that specially empowered committees
should be set up at three levels, namely (i) RBI, (ii) banks, and (iii) borrower,
to continuously monitor large loan portfolios. Further, these committees may be
mandated to submit periodical reports on their findings, to the central government
and Parliament.
* Restructuring of loans:
The Committee observed that currently banks restructure loans on the basis of
classification of their assets, and other benefits related to provisioning. It
suggested that banks should carry out such restructuring by taking into account
the temporary
inability of the borrower to repay the loan and to preserve the
economic value of the assets. It further suggested that indicators should be developed
for projects when a loan is sanctioned. The indicators would facilitate
monitoring of loans, and pre-empt the possibility of an NPA.
* Wilful defaulters:
Wilful default refers to a situation where a borrower defaults in making
repayments, despite having sufficient resources. The Committee observed
that wilful defaulters constituted 21% of the total NPAs of banks. In
this context, it suggested that banks should make names of the top
30 wilful defaulters public. Such a step would act as a deterrent
for others to default willingly on loan repayment. It suggested that necessary
amendments should be made to the RBI Act, 1934, and any law or guideline in
force, to allow for such public disclosure. Further, the Committee recommended
that names
of companies that have undergone restructuring of their loans, should also be
made public.
* Timeline for Corporate Debt
Restructuring: Corporate Debt Restructuring
(CDR) is a voluntary mechanism, which involves restructuring of debt of
entities which are facing problems in repaying loans. The Committee observed
that currently deliberations among stakeholders to settle CDR cases continue
for years. It recommended that a timeline of six months should be introduced
to settle such cases.
* Strategic Debt Restructuring:
Strategic Debt Restructuring (SDR) empowers banks to take control over the management
of the defaulting company, by converting the loan into equity. The Committee
recommended that a change in management of the company should be made
mandatory, in cases involving wilful default, or where funds have been diverted
and no recovery is possible.
* Absorbing written off NPAs:
The Committee suggested that the RBI should consider allowing banks to absorb
their written-off assets gradually, in a staggered manner. This would help
the banks in restoring their balance sheets to normal health.
No comments:
Post a Comment