Lessons
from conviction of Yasin Bhatkal
The conviction on 19th December, 2016 of Mohammed Ahmed Siddibapa,
better known as Yasin Bhatkal,
and four other men for the 2013 twin bombings in Hyderabad’s Dilsukhnagar is the first successful prosecution
ever brought against members of the Indian
Mujahideen network.
Dozens of its alleged operatives have been
incarcerated in prisons across the country. Not one, however, had been
convicted for the long-running urban terror campaign that claimed over 200
lives since it began in 1995, until the Dilsukhnagar judgment.
Why should this be a cause of concern?
For all the elements in India’s criminal justice
system — the police who investigate cases, the lawyers responsible for
prosecuting and defending litigants, and, of course, the judges — this ought to
be a matter of grave concern. For citizens, it is even more so: If India’s criminal justice system
cannot address high-profile terrorism cases, what hope is there of seeing law
and order enforced in more routine matters?
Lessons can usefully be learned from what went
right in Hyderabad:
Good
job done by NIA: Ever
since Siddibapa was held in an Intelligence Bureau-led operation in 2013, the
case was handed over to the National Investigation Agency. This allowed for the
Dilsukhnagar investigation to be given the resources
it needed, something overburdened and under-equipped state police forces often
lack. The result was a compelling
prosecution case.
Speedy
Trial: The fact that NIA cases
are heard in special courts, too, allowed for the prosecution to proceed
relatively rapidly, at least by Indian standards.
System
strengthening required for state law enforcement agencies: To conclude that all major cases should be
handled by élite agencies like the NIA, though, would be to learn the wrong
lessons: The sheer volume of significant counter-terrorism cases nationwide
would simply drown any central organisation in work. Instead, the central and
state governments need to come up with a road-map for capacity-building in police forces across the country, to
give them the human resources,
training standards and investigative infrastructure that they so
desperately need.
Criminal
Justice System: There
is also a compelling case for better prosecutors, and better-functioning
criminal courts.
Last
Word: These issues should be
matters of concern for us all, not just criminal defendants. A democracy which
cannot dispense justice is one that destines all its citizens to live in fear.
India's
Legal System: In need of broad and deep reforms
Link to our above blog:
No comments:
Post a Comment