37. THE DRAVIDIAN MOVEMENT – A TRIBUTE TO M KARUNANIDHI

In recent years sociologists and social anthropologists have started conducting enquiries into Indian political institutions. Many of these sociological studies, based on intensive fieldwork experience in specific areas in India, focus attention on the importance of social factors in the political processes of the country. These studies show, in particular, the role of caste affiliations in the politics of the country. However, there is no single comprehensive sociological work on the contemporary history of India. This is a great lacuna in our studies on modern India which needs to be urgently filled.

No study on contemporary Indian problems will be complete without any reference to the various socio-political movements which arose in the early years of this century as a protest against the domination of certain sections of population in different parts of India. The Dravida Kazagam (DK) and the Dravida Munnetra Kazagam (DMK) movement in Tamilnad are one such development in peninsular India.

Genesis of D M K

Today the DK and DMK play an important part in the social and political life of the people of Tamilnad. In recent years these two organisations have come to attract nation-wide attention as a result of their militant and separatist activities. To understand the present position of the DK and DMK movement in the country it is very necessary to trace its history. There are not very many authentic historical accounts on the DK and DMK movements in Tamilnad. The few that are available do not give a complete picture of the movement. Therefore, T M Parthasarathy's comprehensive book is very welcome.

The DK and DMK movement has its genesis in the Brahman—nonBrahman conflict. The Brahman—nonBrahman conflict in Tamilnad has been associated with three organisations, first the Justice Party, then the DK and now the DMK. It should be kept in mind that although the first two organisations were specifically created to assert the rights of non-Brahmans against the dominant position of the Brahmans, the DMK has not been explicitly anti-Brahmanical in its aims and programmes. Stated briefly then the history of the movement may be outlined in three phases largely corresponding to the development of the three organisations.

Justice Party

The call for the promotion of the interests of 'Dravidians' was given first by the Thenindeya Nala Urumai Sangam (South Indian Welfare Society or Party) which was founded in 1916. The move for establishing such a society was initiated by Sir P Thyagarayar. At the time of its establishment the Society consisted of such eminent non-Brahman leaders as Dr T M Nair, Dr C Natesa Mudaliar, Raja of Panagal and Sir A Ramasami Mudaliar. The Society started running three daily newspapers, one in English called Justice, another in Tamil called Dravidan and the third one in Telegu called Andera Prakashani. This Society was later on popularly called the 'Justice Party' after the title of its English newspaper. The Justice Party contested the 'election' in 1920 and formed the first-ever Indian 'cabinet' in Madras in 1921. The Justice Party had put up candidates again during the 1923 election and it formed the second cabinet in the following year. But in the elections held in 1926 the Justice Party could not secure a majority of seats in the State Legislature and lost the control of the State to the Swarajya Party. The Justice Party never completely recovered from the defeat of 1926, though it lingered on as a party till 1936. The general elections in 1936 gave the last blow to the Justice Party, for no member belonging to the party was elected to the State Legislature. The image of the Justice Party as the organisation of rich landlords and Western-educated upper-caste non-Brahman intellectuals of Tamilnad and Telegu country contributed, to a certain extent, to its downfall.

The Justice Party became a defunct organisation by 1940. However, the call for the promotion of the interests of 'Dravidians' did not end with the Justice Party, and that responsibility was taken over by the Dravida Kazagam. The DK, founded in 1942 by E V Ramasami Naicker (Who is popularly known as Periyar or 'the Elder') aimed at the organisation of 'Dravidians' towards the goal of 'self respect' (suyamariyathai). The establishment of the DK in itself should be considered as the culmination of the suyamariyathat movement which was set in motion right from the hayday of the Justice Party. Periyar, the founderleader of the DK, advocated that the non-Brahmans, i e, persons other than the Brahmans, in Tamilnad should oppose anybody calling them nonBrahmans but should consider themselves as belonging to the 'Dravidian race'. Periyar also propagated the positive identity of non-Brahmans as members of a 'Dravidian nation' entitled to sovereign independence from the Indian union. This ideology found expression in slogans such as 'thamezar nadu thamezarukke' (Tamilnad belongs to only Tamilians) and 'Dravida nadu Dravidarukke' (the land of the Dravidians belongs only to Dravidians). The hold of E V Ramasami Naicker on the movement did not last long. His influence was considerably curtailed by the establishment of the DMK.

D K and DMK :

The Differences The DMK was formed in 1949 by some of the ambitious followers of Periyar under the leadership of C N Annadurai (who is popularly known as Aringar Anna or Learned Elder Brother), when Periyar—at that time a man of 72—married a girl of 28 years. Though the followers of Anna had differences with Periyar on the marriage question, the differences were more deep-rooted. The DMK as an organisation differed from DK in its principles and objectives. In the first place, DK under the control of a single person, the Periyar, was not a wellknit organisation. The DMK. on the other hand, from its inception believed in facing the problems it confronted as a single organisation. In the second place, Periyar at no time gave any serious thought to the question of making DK a political party interested in capturing a place for itself in the political institutions of the country. The DMK, on the other hand, has been taking an active part in the political field and it has been putting up candidates for municipal, State and parliamentary elections.

Anti-North Orientation

The DK and DMK movement, started initially as a protest against the domination of the Brahmans in Tamilnad, was given a new dimension after India's Independence when the attack was directed against the alleged domination of North India. It found expression in the slogan 'therku thaikerathu, vadaku valarkerathu', i e, the South is receding and the North is progressing. Opposition to 'Aryan' domination is the common reason for the movement's antipathy to the Brahmans and the North. In order to escape the alleged domination of the North, the DMK started the agitation for an independent 'Dravida nadu' or 'Dravidasthan'. It seems, from the book under review, that though the DMK has because of legal and constitutional compulsions given up recently its demand for an independent Gravida nadu', it has not lost faith in the ideal. Along with the movement against the Brahmans and the North, a host of other activities were initiated, primarily directed against the use of Hindi language in schools and colleges in Tamilnad and the use of Sanskrit in temple worship and against idol worship.

xxx

HISTORICAL & SOCIAL BACKGROUND

The formation of Justice Party was another important event which mobilized backward castes politically in Tamil Nadu. The basic idea behind its formation was that the non-Brahmins realized the importance of literacy as a base of Brahmins’ virtual monopoly of government offices. Dr. T.M. Nair, P. Thyagaraja Chetty, and C.N. Mudaliar were the founding fathers of justice party. The proclaimed objective of justice party was to provide justice to all Dravidians through the establishment of a separate state under the auspices of the British government (Mukhopadhyay 2012). During the second quarter of the 20th century, the Self Respect movement introduced a programme of non-Brahmin uplift in Tamil Nadu that consisted of a radical critique of social, political and economic relations. Periyar E.V. Ramaswamy was the leader of this movement. It was a popular movement, which occurred in Tamil Nadu in 1925. Its main aim was to improve upon the socio-economic conditions of the low castes Tamils. Later it had profound implications.

Self Respect was not only a set of arguments, but also a set of practical strategies for transforming everyday and ritual life into revolutionary propaganda through choice of dress, names, home décor and domestic ritual, as well as through attending public meetings and reading newspapers. In particular, ‘modern, Self Respecting Tamil couples’ were projected as a resolution to what the Self Respect movement high-lighted as the social, political and economic problems perpetuated by the traditional joint family. Yet, over the course of the 20th century in Tamil Nadu, marriage and family proved to be unstable vehicles for the revolutionary transformation of socio-political domains (Hodges 2005). According to Mukhopadhyay (2012) this movement suffered split with Annadurai forming the Dravid Munnetra Kazagam with active support from Karunanidhi, Natarajan, and Sampth. The Dravidian movement which has started out as a movement for the upliftment of Adi-Dravida and the Dalits, later got involved in active politics, and DMK became a political entity with a massive following of backward classes and Dalits in Tamil Nadu.

Xxx

EMERGENCE OF DMK AS A POLITICAL FORCE AND FORMATION OF AIADMK

The political plunge bore fruit in 1967, when the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam, an offshoot of the Dravidar Kazhagam, swept the Assembly elections. CN Annadurai became the Chief Minister and remained in office until his death in February 1969. He was succeeded by M Karunanidhi – the incumbent president of the party. The first government legalised “self-respect marriage”, implemented pro-poor schemes like providing subsidised rice and promoted the Tamil language. The party won its second consecutive election in 1971. By then, however, inner-party rivalry and allegations of corruption weakened the ideological bearings. A year later, actor MGR left the party to form his own – All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam. This split the Dravidian movement into two and the rivalry between them continues till date.

XXX

TIMELINE

The Beginnings: The Dravidian Movement emerged in the late 19th and early 20th centuries as the response of non-Brahmin communities to Brahmin dominance in public life, especially government. The South Indian Liberal Federation (popularly called the Justice Party) was the first organised platform of non-Brahmins in Madras presidency. The Party won elections in 1920 on an anti-Brahmin, anti-Congress platform. Its anti-Brahmin manifesto, while complaining about Brahmin domination in jobs, did not, however, challenge the ritual status of Brahmins. The Self Respect Movement begun by Periyar E V Ramasami (left), who had left the Congress over its conservative approach to caste, provided the radical edge to the Movement. Periyar was anti-caste and anti-religion.

1944: Dravidar Kazhagam (DK): In 1938, Justice Party (1916) and Self Respect Movement (1925) came together under Periyar’s leadership. In 1944, the new outfit was renamed Dravidar Kazhagam. DK was anti-Brahmin, anti-Congress and anti-Aryan (read North Indian). In 1938, when Rajagopalachari’s Congress ministry imposed Hindi in the state, DK launched protests that became a movement for an independent Dravida nation. DK is today led by K Veeramani (right).

1949: Annadurai Forms DMK: DK did not accept Indian independence and continued the demand for Dravida Nadu. Periyar also refused to contest elections. In 1949, the DK split and Periyar’s charismatic lieutenant, C N Annadurai, walked away with supporters to form the DMK. Annadurai joined the electoral process, with social democracy and Tamil cultural nationalism defining his politics. He was silent on Dravida Nadu. In 1967, DMK won office; Annadurai became Chief Minister.

1972: DMK Splits, MGR Walks: In 1969, Annadurai died and M Karunanidhi (left) took control of DMK. In 1972, differences between Karunanidhi and M G Ramachandran (right), actor and charismatic campaigner, split the party. MGR formed the AIADMK, with associations of his fans as the organisation’s bedrock. In 1977, MGR came to power, and remained undefeated until his death in 1987. He diluted the rationalist and anti-Brahmin agenda, and opted for welfarism as party ideology.

The Dravidian Movement Today: It is represented by DK, DMK, AIADMK and MDMK. DK does not contest polls; propagates Periyar’s ideals including atheism and rationalist practices.