When BJP prime ministerial candidate Narendra Modi contested
from Varanasi as well as Vadodara in the last Lok Sabha elections, the obvious
objective was to demonstrate his mass appeal across states, besides drumming up
support for the BJP in Uttar Pradesh. After he won from both constituencies, PM
Modi retained Varanasi and gave up Vadodara.
Over the years, several senior leaders have contested two
constituencies in Lok Sabha and Assembly elections. Some contested even three, until 1996, when an amendment to the
Representation of the People Act, 1951, restricted to two the number of seats
one candidate could contest in one election. And whenever they have won more
than one, the candidates have retained only one, forcing bypolls in the rest.
Last week, the Election
Commission told the Supreme Court in an affidavit that Section 33(7) of the Act
should be amended to restrict any candidate to only one seat in one election.
This was after the court had sought the EC’s response to a public interest
petition challenging the validity of the provision that still allows a
candidate to contest two seats simultaneously.
The affidavit said: “When
a candidate contests from two seats, it is imperative that he has to vacate one
of the two seats if he wins both. This, apart from the consequent unavoidable
financial burden on the public exchequer, government manpower and other
resources for holding by-election against the resultant vacancy, is also an
injustice to the voters of the constituency which the candidate is quitting
from. There have been several cases where a person contests election from two
constituencies and wins both.”
It referred to an earlier proposal to end or restrict this
practice: “The Election Commission
proposed amendment of Section 33(7) in the year 2004 to provide that a person
cannot contest from more than one constituency at a time. However, in case
the existing provisions are to be retained, a candidate contesting from two
seats should bear the cost of the by-election to the seat that contestant
decides to vacate in the event of him/her winning both seats. The amount in
such an event could be Rs 5 lakh for state assembly and Rs 10 lakh for the
general election.”
That cost would have multiplied many times now. The latter
proposal, if put into practice, would have allowed only candidates with
resources to contest two seats, and then bear the cost of a resultant by-election
in the event of their winning both. Also, if winners were to pay for causing
by-elections, what about those caused by the resignations of sitting MPs, like
those of the YSR Congress last week?
The Law Commission
has agreed with the proposal to bar a person from contesting more than one seat
at a time but has not endorsed the alternative proposal that winning
candidates also shoulder the cost of ensuing by-elections. Earlier, the Dinesh Goswami Committee report in 1990
and the 170th report of the Law
Commission on “Electoral Reforms” in 1999 had included recommendations for
restricting one contestant to one seat.
In the original 1951
Act, Section 33 permitted a person to contest from more than one seat, while
Section 70 of the Act prevented him or her from holding on to more than one
seat in state or central legislatures. In the 1957 Lok Sabha election, when
a fledgling Bharatiya Jana Sangh was struggling to grow, Atal Bihari Vajpayee,
then 32, tried his luck from three constituencies in UP — Balrampur, Mathura
and Lucknow — after having finished third in Lucknow in the 1952 polls.
Vajpayee got elected from Balrampur, finished second in Lucknow and forfeited
his deposit in Mathura. The Balrampur victory introduced the young Opposition
leader to Lok Sabha, dominated by the Congress then.
In 1977, Indira Gandhi suffered
a surprise defeat in her well-nursed constituency, Rae Bareli; in 1980, she did
not want to risk that again. She filed her nomination from Medak (now in
Telangana) and Rae Bareli. It was packaged as an attempt to bridge the divide
between the North and the South. She won from both constituencies, and chose to
forgo Medak.
Many leaders continued the trend, both before and after the
1996 amendment that set the limit at two seats — Vajpayee (Vidisha and Lucknow
in 1991), L K Advani (New Delhi and Gandhinagar in 1991), Sonia Gandhi (Bellary
and Amethi in 1999), Mulayam Singh Yadav (Azamgarh
and Mainpuri in 2014) and Lalu Prasad (Saran and Pataliputra in 2009).
Regional leaders took this to another level. Telugu Desam
Party founder N T Rama Rao contested three seats — Gudivada, Hindupur and
Nalgonda — in the 1985 Assembly polls, won all, retained Hindupur and vacated
the other two, forcing by-elections there. In 1991, Haryana deputy chief minister
Devi Lal contested three Lok Sabha seats — Sikar, Rohtak and Ferozepur — as
well as the Ghirai assembly seat. He lost them all. Had he won everywhere,
three by-elections would have been necessitated.
Now, the Supreme Court is seized of the matter. And the
Election Commission has taken a position.
Credit: Indian Express Explained
No comments:
Post a Comment