5 Arguments Against State Funding of Elections

1. State funding increases the distance between political leaders and ordinary citizens as they do not depend on citizens for mobilization of party funds.
2. If all or substantial amount of the party income comes directly from the State rather than from voluntary sources, political parties risk losing their independence and become organs of the State, thereby losing their ties to the civil society.
3. State funding would encourage non-serious candidates to enter into political arena merely to avail of state funds.
4. Many experts believe that state funding of election will not stop parties from lobbying and getting undisclosed additional funds.
5. State funding of elections will increase burden on the exchequer with no guarantee that black money will stop playing a role in the electoral process.

5 Arguments in Favour of State Funding of Elections

1. It creates a level playing field for parties and candidates with fewer resources.
2. It helps to reduce the dependency on corporate or private money.
3. By providing floor level fund” to everyone, state fund scheme can be very helpful for smaller and newer political entrants.
4. Candidates who are elected through a fair electoral process would be transparent and accountable in providing governance.
5. Through state funding the demand for internal democracy in party, women representations, representations of weaker section can be encouraged.