Pages

Friday, September 30

Lack of Intra-Party Democracy: Consequences and Remedies



Lack of Intra-Party Democracy: Consequences and Remedies


By Looma Kushwaha

UPSC General Studies: Paper II (Representation of People's Act)

Table of Content
What is inner party democracy?
Why it is necessary for India to have inner party democracy?
Without inner party democracy, India has been reduced to a procedural democracy rather than being a substantive democracy. Discuss.
Observations of the 15th Law Commission
Recommendations of 20th Law Commission Report
Conclusion

Internal democracy in political parties, also known as intra-party democracy, refers to the level and methods of including party members in the decision making and deliberation within the party structure.  Intra-party democracy is usually known to nurture citizens’ political competencies and/or producing more capable representatives which in turn ensures that the party produces better policies and political programmes.



What is intra-party democracy?

Internal democracy in political parties, also known as intra-party democracy, refers to the level and methods of including party members in the decision making and deliberation within the party structure.

Intra-party democracy is usually known to nurture citizens’ political competencies and/or producing more capable representatives which in turn ensures that the party produces better policies and political programmes.



Why is it necessary for India to have inner party democracy?

The roots of the most pertinent challenges faced by Indian politics today can be traced to the lack of intra-party democracy in candidate selection and party elections.

The absence of intra-party democracy has contributed to political parties becoming

* Closed autocratic structures with increasing fragmentation within parties

* Selection of poor electoral representatives

* Growing criminalization


* Abuse of financial power in elections. 


Without inner party democracy, India has been reduced to a procedural democracy rather than being a substantive democracy. Discuss.

Law commission makes a very important distinction between:

Procedural democracy: the practice of universal adult franchise, periodic elections, secret ballot.

Substantive democracy: “to refer to the internal democratic functioning of the parties, which purportedly represent the people.”

Noting that “currently, there is no express provision for internal democratic regulation of political parties in India,” there is no mechanism to review a party’s practice against the principles enshrined in the constitution or against the requirements of the ECI’s Guidelines and Application Format for the Registration of Political Parties under Section 29A. 


Observations of the 15th Law Commission on this matter:

“It must be said that if democracy and accountability constitute the core of our constitutional system, the same concepts must also apply to and bind the political parties which are integral to parliamentary democracy. It is the political parties that form the government, man parliament and run the governance of the country.

It is, therefore, necessary to introduce

Internal democracy, financial transparency and accountability in the working of the political parties.

A political party which does not respect democratic principles in its internal working cannot be expected to respect those principles in the governance of the country. It cannot be dictatorship internally and democratic in its functioning outside”.


Recommendations of 20th Law Commission Report:

* Insert a new chapter (IV-C) into the Representation of People Act dealing with the ‘Regulation of Political Parties’. Thus, sections 29J to 29Q will deal with internal democracy, party constitutions, party organisation, internal elections, candidate selection, voting procedures, and the ECI’s power to de-register a party in certain cases of non-compliance.

* Another section 29R should be inserted in the same part, providing for the de-registration of a political party for failure to contest parliamentary or state elections for 10 consecutive years.


Conclusion :

Politics is inseparable from political parties as they are the prime instruments for the execution of democracy in the country. The selection of candidates, the mobilisation of the electorate, the formulation of agendas and the passing of legislation are all conducted through political parties. They are the only organisations in the country that seek, compete for, and acquire power over state apparatus, control over public funds, government bureaucracy and legislative mechanisms.

It is therefore surprising how little has been done to strengthen the processes of institutionalisation of intra-party democracy in political parties in India. It is imperative that political parties open their eyes to growing calls for electoral political reforms and take steps towards bringing in intra-party democracy.

Also Democracy requires more than just institutions. It also requires that people use those institutions in good faith, and believe in them. It requires that individuals encourage substantial debate, allow for dissent, and seek compromise rather than misuse power. Nonetheless, democratic institutions are important because they enable such individuals to pursue changes. 



Bibliography

*Dynasty politics in the largest democracy

*Let them fight

*Political parties must institutionalise intra-party democracy

*How your vote can be more effective

*Is There Intra-party Democracy in Indian Political Parties?

*Democracy Within and Without: A Report on Inner-Party Democracy in Political Parties in India

*Methods of Promoting Internal Democracy in Political Parties;

No comments:

Post a Comment